Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

3.2 - Assignment: Critical Analysis - Proactive and Predictive Safety Program (PLG1)

3.2 - Assignment: Critical Analysis - Proactive and Predictive Safety Program (PLG1)

Q Review the module material and respond to the following prompt and question using the written format included in the instructions and support pages. Writing Prompt and Question Defend the importance of a proactive and predictive aviation safety program as it relates to reducing risk and hazard. Explain the value of a proactive safety risk management program. Your papers must demonstrate a comprehension of the issue based on facts, not opinion. Facts may be from the course or other stated references. Opinions must be corroborated by references. Use proper terminology as you apply the process (evaluation and analytical) of assessing hazards and risks to an aviation safety program. Instructions Write a 3-4 page response, double-spaced, using an average of 1,000-words. Solid writing using APA mechanics and style are required. Support your answers and data with references and cite your sources. The substance is what matters. You should review and utilize the American Psychological Association’s Publication Manual, a required text for this course, as guidance for your submissions. A title and reference page are additional pages to the 3-4 page response. All other APA formatting applies. For writing assignment guidance and standard criteria, please refer to the Writing Assignment Information and Academic Resources pages. Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

Introduction This paper has been designed to provide research about proactive and predictive aviation safety programs. The positive influence of these programs for different individuals associated with the aviation industry will be stated and explained in the paper. If there is no application of proactive program, there can be issues developed for aviation organizations. The same can be said for predictive program. These issues will be identified and highlighted in the paper. The process of adaptation to apply proactive or predictive program can be filled with difficulties. These difficulties will be identified and illustrated. The proactive program’s value will be identified, analyzed and validated with evidence from research in the paper. Proactive and predictive aviation safety programs Active infrastructural support and manpower are characteristics of the proactive program (Safety Management System Toolkit, 2009). This is because diversified types of risks are tried to be recognized by the application of this program. There are standards of the common processes of operations in the aviation industry which are applied to resolve every aviation issue via this program (Safety Management System Toolkit, 2009). Activeness is mandatory for every aviation industry employee to show and practice in this program. This is because the level of proactiveness required for specific situations can be shown and utilized accordingly. The system processes are most important components of aviation companies to be concentrate on for applying the predictive program (Safety Management System Toolkit, 2009). The environment of risk and operations is thoroughly known about in details in this program (Safety Management System Toolkit, 2009). The maximum level of potential present in all working members of aviation companies can be identified with the application of this program. This is because performance of working members in unforeseen circumstances of emergencies can be measured and judged conveniently (Safety Management System Toolkit, 2009). The predictive program enables professional individuals in aviation to ensure that future challenges can be recognized after analyzing specific trends and situations of risks (Safety Management System Toolkit, 2009).